As Prince Charles gazed at the Royal Crown on Tuesday morning, which was rested on a velvet cushion instead of his mother’s head, he looked moody and a little out of place.
Charles is certainly very passionate about fulfilling his destiny and taking the throne. And his appearance at the Houses of Parliament on Tuesday, tasked with carrying out the monarch’s most important constitutional duty on behalf of his mother, opened a new legislative session of Parliament. invites him — and the world — to their minds. looking forward to what his reign will look and feel like.
But between now and then, there is the inevitable fact of the death of his mother. And the inevitable question, following her last-minute decision not to show up in London on Tuesday for that ceremony, is how soon that will be.
Her age and her obvious inability to perform any of her important duties anymore – she won’t show up at garden parties this summer, for example – has sparked speculation. speculates that Buckingham Palace is downplaying the true extent of the challenges facing her health by describing her as merely suffering from “episodic mobility problems”.
But the arrival of Prince Charles in full military uniform and seated on the throne (he is, in fact, seated on his spouse’s throne, a symbolic inch shorter than the monarch’s) at the Palace of Westminster , and the fact that the queen honored her son and heir acting for her using the Regency Act, officially brought the rumor mill into overdrive.
Even Buckingham Palace is now admitting in briefings that the queen may not have managed to appear in person at the Platinum Jubilee and that her presence (or otherwise) would be just a matter of how she feels. see what the day looks like.
At best, it is thought, the queen could make a one-on-one balcony appearance for Trooping the Colour (her official birthday, which falls on Thursday 2 June this year, the opening of Jubilee weekend) and perhaps another “surprise” appearance at the closing. Last Sunday evening of the Holy Year.
She is expected to attend St Paul’s Church Thanksgiving for her reign, which Harry and Meghan will likely attend. But the idea of her sitting in a lengthy church service in her own honor seemed like a fantasy after Tuesday’s absence.
At the palace, there was a growing sense of readiness for the moment the London Bridge finally fell (“London Bridge fell” was a code phrase that would be used by government and palace officials to denote that the queen passed away on the day of terror.)
Speculations and rumors may be getting extreme, but the truth is that no one knows exactly what happened to the queen, outside, a hypothetical, about her doctor (and perhaps Thailand). Prince Charles, who might explain his hangover).
The most convincing rumors were the rumors that she had problems with her heart, and that the reason she was hospitalized for a checkup last year was because she had to have an MRI. This full-body scan is one of the few procedures that can’t be done in a home hospital of the kind that have been established in Buckingham Palace for many years, and are now rumored to be around for a long time. Windsor Castle, where the Queen currently lives.
But of course, MRI can be used to diagnose a whole range of health problems, including back problems, which would be in line with the palace’s narrative that there is nothing more worrisome when The queen must mind commuting from time to time.
The extreme secrecy surrounding HM’s happiness bounced back a curtain on the declining health of her father, George VI, who died in 1952 from complications from lung cancer. He was 56 years old. He was unable to recover from an operation to remove a cancerous lung in 1951, and his death was a complete shock to the nation and his family, although perhaps not. to his doctors.
The case of a 96-year-old is, of course, very different. In the end, everyone dies; they don’t usually do it under the glare of the media.
However, there are still some savvy observers who think the queen can go on longer than some think.
And it should be noted that there is really no doubt that among those who know her or have spent time with her, happily, the mental elements of the queen are quite unaffected, any illness What physicality is surrounding her. For example, her audience with the prime minister on Wednesday is expected to go ahead as planned, and she will even do a few video-link engagements this week.
Robert Hardman, author of Queen of our times, an explicit biography of Elizabeth produced with the help of Buckingham Palace, told The Daily Beast: “I think the real issue is portability, not something more troubling in terms of facets. medical. But the problem is that her absence at the Opening Ceremony of Congress was not unprecedented, but rather the solution to her absence – the use of the Regent Act – was so. But this was not done in the name of the sovereign, like the last time we had regency, in 1811. This is the Sovereign that sets the rules.
“It is another slow and gradual move in the transition that has seen Charles become more and more involved, which really started nine years ago when he traveled to Sri Lanka to open the Meeting of the the heads of the commonwealth there.”
“The use of the Regency Act is the first step towards abdication, which in my opinion will happen after the Jubilee Year is over.”
– Clive Irving
The Regency Act, officially signed into law in 1937, provides for a permanent retrograde position in the event the monarch is unable to carry out their duties. In fact, the immediate impetus was because Princess Elizabeth, the heir apparent, was then under 18 years of age (Prior to 1937, regency could only be established on a case-by-case basis; for example, Tao the regency law of 1811 allowed the Prince of Wales to represent George III.) The 1937 act provided that a regent must be appointed if “the sovereign is by reason of mental or physical impairment incapable. ability to perform royal functions during this period,” and it also applied to minor monarchs.
Clive Irving, founding editor of The Sunday Times’ Insight investigative journalism team and author of The Last Queen, told The Daily Beast: “It’s important to grasp an easily overlooked point because there’s so little precedent to guide it: She doesn’t have to die in the saddle, like Victoria, after a quick breakdown. fast. There’s nothing in the protocols to say that. So the best thing would be for her to abdicate. The use of the Regency Act is the first step towards the abdication, which, in my opinion, will happen after the Jubilee is over.”
The Daily Beast has previously revealed the queen is using a wheelchair at home, which the palace is unwilling to confirm, and has a feeling that the queen does not want to be a “wheelchair monarch”. Some might say that only increased the pressure on her to step down.
Duncan Larcombe, former royal editor of The Sun, told The Daily Beast: “I understand there’s nothing seriously wrong with her, she’s only 96 years old, and I suspect, for all the words. denied by the palace, that Charles would indeed be officially installed in some kind of regent capacity within a year.
“Tuesday changed everything. The Queen really has no choice if she is constantly unable to perform her role as head of state. Can’t make it to a climate summit in Glasgow, but if she’s clearly incapable of doing core, standard jobs now as head of state, then I think they would have to get rid of her, of course. ”
“It’s all going to make Jubilee so profound, I think by then, we’ll all realize that this will be the last time we’ll see her. The countdown has begun.”
– Duncan Larcombe
Larcombe said the palace is using the word “mobile” to avoid using the word “sick”, you can trigger the Regent Act. “But in the end, if the CEO can’t get into the office, they won’t be able to do any face-to-face work,” he told The Daily Beast. “In her case, it was the investment posts, the army of color, the garden parties and the opening of Congress. From today on will not come back and they all know it.
“The use of the Regency Act is very intentional. I’m sure at Buckingham Palace and Clarence House they were all very pleased with today’s turn of events. He didn’t flaunt his lines, he was well received. It’s all going to make Jubilee so profound, I think by then, we’ll all realize that this will be the last time we’ll see her. The countdown has begun. ”
The palace said it had “nothing to add” to Monday’s statement, which read: “The Queen continues to experience mobility issues from time to time and is in consultation with her doctors.” She has reluctantly decided that she will not attend the Opening Ceremony of Parliament tomorrow. At the Queen’s request, and with the consent of the relevant authorities, the Prince of Wales will deliver the Queen’s Speech on behalf of the Queen, which will be attended by the Duke of Cambridge. ”
However, a source at the palace said that the queen had “a busy diary this week with a call with Australia… a Privy Council audience and PM (virtual and via phone) on Wednesday and is expected to make some private engagements later in the week.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/will-queen-elizabeth-abdicate-after-her-platinum-jubilee?source=articles&via=rss Will Queen Elizabeth Die After the Platinum Jubilee?