The chairman of UEFA’s Referees Committee, Roberto Rosetti, has spoken of his satisfaction and pleasure on the excellent total efficiency of Europe’s prime match officers at UEFA EURO 2020.
The referee groups’ work on and off the sphere earned them fixed plaudits and received them renewed respect over an intense month of EURO motion.
Talking at a post-EURO briefing on Wednesday, Rosetti additionally gave prime marks to the video assistant referee (VAR) groups for his or her important contribution in serving to to make sure that appropriate refereeing choices had been taken on the 51 matches performed at 11 venues throughout Europe. As well as, he thanked gamers and coaches for his or her conduct in the direction of referees on the event.
“Very pleased with them”
“The refereeing on the EURO was extraordinarily profitable, and we’re very happy,” mentioned Rosetti. “There have been some nice performances – not solely from the referees, but in addition the assistant referees. The referees had been at all times in management and produced a really excessive stage of accuracy of their decision-making. They’ve been skilled in every little thing that they’ve finished – we’re very pleased with them.”
Rosetti, a former worldwide referee himself, particularly welcomed the widespread reward given to the EURO match officers. “The scope to criticise the referees was very restricted,” he mirrored. “Their work over 51 matches was seamless. We noticed extra optimistic feedback about referees than ever earlier than.”
Energy and human abilities
Nineteen referees and their teams were chosen to take part in the EURO. LINK “The choice of the referees proved to be essential,” Rosetti defined. “We appeared for sturdy referees with glorious human qualities. The gamers and coaches instantly understood these qualities, and I believe this was one of many keys to the referees’ success on the event.”
Rosetti additionally recognized the shut bond among the many referees at their EURO basecamp in Istanbul as a vital issue. “There was a implausible environment inside the referees,” he mentioned. “The skilled work of the health workforce, UEFA’s workers and everybody working behind the scenes was additionally an enormous assist to them. We had a household feeling, with everybody pulling collectively to make every little thing run easily.”
“The referee from South America, Fernando Rapallini, was a high quality addition to the workforce with the standard of his refereeing, and he built-in inside the referees’ group completely.”
Reward for gamers and coaches
Rosetti hailed the gamers and coaches of the 24 taking part groups for his or her angle in the direction of the match officers. An important issue had been the visits made by UEFA’s refereeing officers to the groups forward of the EURO to clarify the UEFA refereeing pointers and directions, and what was anticipated of the groups. “I need to congratulate the gamers and particularly the coaches for his or her behaviour and their type,” he mentioned. “Throughout the semi-finals and remaining particularly, I assumed that the coaches gave a terrific lesson in honest play.”
Referees: Details and figures
Rosetti introduced key refereeing statistics from the EURO:
Drop in fouls
Variety of fouls compared to EURO 2016 (51 matches)
2020 : 1,113 (21.8 fouls per match)
2016 : 1,290 (25.3 fouls per match)
Fewer yellow playing cards
Yellow playing cards compared to EURO 2016 (51 matches)
2020 : 98 (2.7 per match)
2016 : 129 (3.5 per match)
Rosetti: “Specifically, there have been fewer yellow playing cards for dissent.”
Pink playing cards compared to EURO 2016 (51 matches)
2020 : 6 (0.16 per match)
2016 : 3 (0.08 per match)
Why VAR labored on the EURO
VAR details and figures
Two rooms on UEFA’s campus in Nyon, Switzerland had been arrange for VAR operations. At every of the 51 EURO matches, the primary video assistant referee (VAR) was accompanied by an assistant video assistant referee (AVAR), and offside video assistant referee.
The VAR was the chief of the workforce and the primary level of contact with the referee, with the duty of focussing on incidents. The AVAR focused on following the match, whereas the offside VAR evaluated all potential offside conditions.
276 incidents checked in 51 matches (5.4 incidents checked each match)
93.5% of selections on the pitch appropriate
18 VAR corrections (9 offside, 4 foul play, 2 handball, 1 use of the elbow, 1 laborious sort out, 1 denying a goalscoring alternative)
10 direct corrections
8 on-field reviews
1 correction each 2.83 matches
Tight offside incidents : 30 (9 VAR reviews)
No improper choices (100% accuracy)
Rosetti: “Offside is now not a difficulty. We’re utilizing the perfect expertise and following its improvement.”
Extra penalties – correct VAR
Penalties compared to EURO 2016
2020 : 17 (0.33 per match) – 6 got here from VAR intervention, all of them had been 100% appropriate
2016 : 12 (0.23 per match)
Rosetti: “VAR helped present a extra correct analysis of incidents within the penalty space.”
“Finest VARS on this planet”
Roberto Rosetti mentioned that the work of the VAR groups in Nyon had been exemplary. “I imagine that Europe has the perfect VARs on this planet,” he emphasised.
“We really feel that VAR is an unbelievable software for soccer, as a result of it helps stop clear and apparent refereeing errors. The 18 VAR corrections on the EURO had been all 100% proper, which reveals the standard of the work that the VAR groups did. We are able to settle for referees’ errors on the sphere – these can occur – however it’s very troublesome to just accept errors by VARs in entrance of a video. Consequently, we had been happy that the EURO VARs’ choices had been so dependable.”
Serving to referees – and the sport
Rosetti underlined that goal of the VAR system was to assist not solely the referees, but in addition soccer. “Minimal interference for optimum profit,” he defined.
“We’re working laborious day by day to enhance the system that’s in place, as a result of there may be at all times room for enchancment. Outcomes present that we’re getting quicker so far as VAR interventions on a world stage are involved. Communication between referees and VARs is bettering. The total image reveals that we’re getting higher.”
“The goal is to not examine each small element in a match. VAR will be very harmful if the system shouldn’t be used appropriately. There are a whole lot of borderline conditions in soccer matches, and VAR can’t remove discussions about such conditions. However I’m positive that if we started checking the smaller issues, individuals wouldn’t like this sort of soccer.”