Film remakes have been popular in the film industry since the 1980s, with varying success. Sometimes a remake is so successful that it replaces the original works in quality and popularity. Despite this, remakes are often heavily criticized and seen as a pointless money-making game. This is especially true when it comes to the world of shot-for-shot remakes, and there aren’t many films that are considered hits.
A shot-for-shot remake It’s a pretty easy concept to understand. This is basically a remake just a copy of the original movie. This includes the story line, the shot list and cinematography, and often the script. A common criticism of this kind of remake is that it’s not worth it. This style of remake tends not to add anything to the original movie or story, as it resembles the original. When one does this kind of remake of a very old movie, it can also be outdated.
While it’s hard to make a shot-for-shot remake that people like, it’s doable. The most famous and beloved example of this is probably Michael Haneke’s 2007 film Fun game. This is a remake of his movie from 10 years ago. However, while the original is set in Austria and in German, remake set in America and in English. While it is basically a copy of the original Fun game, it’s one of the only shot-for-shot remakes with quality and impact.
The concept and plot of both Fun game identical movies. They revolve around a single middle-class family consisting of a mother, a father and their son. While at their motel, two young men intrude into their lives and essentially take them hostage while forcing them to play brutal physical and psychological games. While there isn’t much on-screen violence shown in the film, they’re still incredibly brutal and hard to watch. Both versions of Fun game will usually be found in the list the most scary and disturbing movies.
Haneke’s intentions behind the film are an interesting one. He has said that it is a commentary on violence in the media, because while this movie is extremely violent, it is also completely pointless in some respects. This includes its epilogue, as well as the “breaking the fourth wall” techniques used by the film’s main antagonist. It constantly blurs the line between fiction and reality, and in some aspects resembles a parody of the family invasion horror/thriller genre.
Although the original film was made in 1997 when the conversation around violence in the media was really a hot topic, what is interesting is that the American remake has been out for all 10 years. later and is still relevant. The movie remains the same, but the setting is completely different. This is partly due to the new one US setting, as well as cultural events that took place during those ten years. In the US especially, conversation around violence in the media reached an all-time high following the 1999 Columbine High School shooting, and even more so in the wake of the attack. September 11, 2001.
Part of what makes Fun game relevant remake which is what Michael Haneke originally wanted for the movie from the start. It was supposed to be Set in America, with English-speaking actors. However, for some logistical reasons, he decided to keep the film in his home country of Austria. Since an American film was his original intention, there is an added value to the remake. It’s not just a simple cash grab or an Americanized version. It’s a closer look at what Michael Haneke’s vision is really supposed to be.
Shot-for-shot remakes are often criticized for being somewhat dull and lifeless compared to the original. This is not the case for Fun game. It’s rare for a director to do a magic trick twice, especially when it comes to remakes, but Haneke does it. Fun game 2007 was just as scary and stressful as Fun game 1997 and there’s nothing about it that feels lackluster. The feeling was completely bleak and the atmosphere was full of terror. Partly because of the actors, especially Naomi Watts and Tim Roth as the main couple and Michael Pitt and Brady Corbet as villains. It’s hard to completely recreate what someone else has done, and somehow you can do it your own way without losing the effect. Somehow, everyone in this movie has managed to do that, which is a big part of what makes it so good.
Although both Fun game the films have received mixed reception from critics and the wider audience, they have a good following and are especially popular with lovers of the horror and unsettling genres . Some continued to be dismissed by the American remake because of the stigma surrounding shot-for-shot renders, but it is a hidden gem that can really stand on its own in terms of intent and quality. Those who were once skeptical about wasting their time with it once they’ve seen the original, should likely rethink their position.
Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint and more will reunite for the 20th anniversary Harry Potter special on HBO MAX.
About the author
https://gamerant.com/funny-games-shot-for-shot-remake-not-pointless/ This is the only Shot-For-Shot Remake that doesn’t feel pointless