Sports

The team and league executives think that the discipline for Rodgers and Packers is not nearly strict enough; show preferential treatment

The decision is merely good Packers $300,000 and Aaron Rodgers less than $15,000 for multiple breaches of COVID protocols that led to a backlash in NFL last week, including many in the federation office, team and federation sources said.

Rodgers misrepresented his stance on vaccinations in public and floated mask-wearing procedures for unvaccinated players, culminating in a lengthy appearance on “The Pat McAfee Show” after he tested positive for COVID-19, in which he commented that he would not be “shy” to wear a mask. Unvaccinated players must be screened daily and wear masks when not on the field, and are also restricted in terms of off-field interactions with teammates, according to protocols negotiated jointly between the NFL and NFLPA . Rodgers did not wear a mask on the sidelines or in media interactions prior to being placed on the COVID-19/prep list and was also captured in images posted on social media. broke off-site rules, including at a Halloween party the Packers players hosted.

The decision to treat the matter as essentially a violation of protocols, rather than dock the team’s draft picks and penalize Rodgers more severely, was mocked throughout the industry. And even many in the federation office believe it is too soft and gives the impression of preferential treatment to a multi-story franchise that does not have a traditional ownership structure and has strong ties to union office. Suffice to say, there will be significant pressure outside of league headquarters, and internally, making it more difficult for the team and future Hall of Fame quarterback if Rodgers continues to breach obvious protocols Future.

“If I were Raiders, or Saints“I would be furious,” said a federation official, noting that the franchise faced much stricter sanctions for violations last year. “Of course, the clubs are not happy. They shouldn’t be.”

A senior team official said: “The reaction is pretty much the same. It’s a joke. It’s the league taking care of (Packers team president) Mark Murphy. It’s not really a surprise. , but that’s the whole BS.”

Another top executive with NFL team said: “Different set of rules for the Packers. They take care of Mark Murphy.”

One NFL coach suggested: “You think they’d let us go if (that team’s quarterback) did it? No (obviously) way.”

Rodgers has yet to meet the media or practice with the team or return to the NFL sideline since the positive results, but his attention will be even more intense now. If he doesn’t quickly put on a side mask – like, say, Colts Gentlemen are not vaccinated Carson Wentz now – there will be lively conversations in union offices and around the federation about how to respond appropriately. Outside of Green Bay, the adoption of this discipline has been globalized.

“Not a pretty look,” said a federation source. “Seems like preferential treatment.”

According to the league, the Packers were very cooperative in the investigation and quickly turned over videos and documents, something not every team has been able to do in these investigations. That was considered in the penalty. While Rodgers hasn’t worn a mask for media obligations for more than half a season – which has sparked outrage if many are around the league – that does count towards the team’s penalty; unlike other situations in the past Packers were not warned in advance of potential penalties. Unvaccinated active players are not allowed to wear masks on the sidelines, although many have done so.



https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/team-league-execs-think-discipline-to-rodgers-packers-not-nearly-stern-enough-shows-preferential-treatment/ | The team and league executives think that the discipline for Rodgers and Packers is not nearly strict enough; show preferential treatment

snopx

Inter Reviewed is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – admin@interreviewed.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button