The Blade movies represent an important rule for the trilogy
Proof of concept for Marvel’s filmmaking efforts comes from Tongue, but the quality of the trio is a mixed bag. Showcasing the genre’s best and worst movie at the same time is inexplicable, but three films created by three different directors are bound to have vastly different results. Trilogy seems to be a default status for the genre of movies, every franchise seems to comfortably divide itself into three parts. You are conflicted will almost certainly continue, but the results are as varied as ever.
1998 Tongue to the big screen from the mind of director Stephen Norrington. This first big screen outing for the character is an incredibly enjoyable ride, relying heavily on the director’s strong image. At the time, he was only directing another film, a sci-fi thriller called Death machine. Since then, his other most famous project was ill-fated in 2003 Federation of Extraordinary Gentlemen. It was an unfortunate project, bogged down by studio notes and conflicts with Sean Connery, that left Norrington disillusioned with the industry. Tongue perhaps the pinnacle of his career in both success and quality, and aside from some special effects work in the mid-2010s, Norrington has been miserably absent from cinema.
Blade II carries a much larger pedigree and comes with consistent quality. This movie comes from the brilliant mind of Guillermo del Toro, who has become a much-loved filmmaker. He is still giving out great movies today, but at the time, Blade II was his first major introduction to an American audience. Last year, del Toro made an excellent Spanish-language horror film The Devil’s Backbone, helping him get the big job in Marvel movies. The second film is almost undeniably the culmination of the trilogy. Del Toro’s horror background, unique interests, and love of monsters make the film an absolute delight.
After a strong start and a great sequel, the third movie comes just in time to ruin everything. Longtime writer David S. Goyer directed Blade: Trinity. The trilogy’s epilogue is considered by many to be a shallow twist on previous films without any aesthetic sharpness or glory. Goyer is a complicated filmmaker, usually a screenwriter rather than a director. He’s a veteran of the superhero genre, but his other directing efforts don’t touch the genre. Mostly supernatural horror or dull action. Goyer co-wrote the dark Knight trilogy, Batman V. Superman, and Man of Steel. Goyer was clearly skilled at writing films, but when it came time to bring his script to life, he faltered miserably.
Triangle different director vision, even with so many returning teams, the franchise is completely different. Watching all three episodes in a row feels more like episodes of the week’s monster-style TV show than a trilogy. Unlike many sequels, the directors felt there was no need to maintain consistency, instead, each offering their own directions for better or worse. Look at that weird line chart of quality Tongue , one has to wonder if it is improved by letting one director retain the dominion.
As Lord of the Rings trilogy, one of the most beloved adaptations of the modern era and the only creative work Peter Jackson’s vision. Jackson’s honest interpretation of origins and beautiful visual storytelling are integral elements of the trilogy, and the inclusion of another director in his role in the middle of the series could would ruin the whole movie line. Jackson even came back for Hobbits trilogy, ensuring he remains Tolkien’s successor as filmmaker. Compare this widely loved adaptation of an iconic novel series with Harry Potter series movie. Eight films brought to the screen by four different directors, are precisely about the kind of wild peaks and valleys expected there.
Of course, this rule is not difficult and quick. Even in Tongue, separate directors have brought success as well as failure. It’s certain that having the director give full control of a trilogy will only fail repeatedly, and surely fans will enjoy a series that gets a glimpse of greatness, if only occasionally. How’s the series? Aliens, Terminators, or Carnivores has the same result as Tongue. Wild director types, not the same quality, sometimes shining brightly, sometimes failing miserably. There are also examples of single directors with different outcomes; Sam Raimi is responsible for the first two Spiderman film, but also responsible for Spider-Man 3. It’s far from being tight-lipped, but the one-director trilogy is sure to offer a more consistent experience.
While it’s clearly not the only role that matters, the director is one of the most important creative forces on a film. The Tongue movies can teach some lessons, and one of the most interesting is that perhaps a trilogy should be treated more like a single story.
THAN: Marvel’s Blade Movie Lessons Should Take From The Original Trilogy
It can be said that the ’90s really were the pinnacle decade of television for sci-fi movies that could stand the test of time.
About the author
https://gamerant.com/blade-movies-rule-trilogies/ The Blade movies represent an important rule for the trilogy