Supreme Court won’t hear case seeking more transparency from secretive FISA court

blank

Privateness advocates have criticized the court docket as a rubber stamp, as a result of judges hear solely the federal government’s request. Most topics by no means know they’re targets or what the federal government advised the decide. In 2019, as an illustration, judges authorized 952 functions in complete or with modifications, whereas denying 58 in complete or partly.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-fisa-surveillance-court/2021/11/01/cbda3126-300c-11ec-9241-aad8e48f01ff_story.html?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=wp_politics | Supreme Court docket will not hear case searching for extra transparency from secretive FISA court docket

Huynh Nguyen

Inter Reviewed is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – admin@interreviewed.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button