What’s extra, the criticism alleges, the lab discovered that each one 20 samples contained “detectable sequences of hen DNA,” whereas 11 samples contained pork DNA and 7 included cattle DNA. The presence of different animal DNA, the criticism argues, undermines Subways’ advertising and marketing and labeling, which means clients will get solely “tuna” once they order such a sandwich, salad or wrap. Prospects, the lawsuit alleges, simply have to take a look at the illuminated menu above the counter to see that Subway guarantees tuna to all those that need it.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/meals/2021/11/10/amended-subway-tuna-lawsuit/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=wp_lifestyle | Subway tuna samples comprise hen, pork and cattle DNA, claims amended lawsuit