Rittenhouse ‘Should Be Acquitted’, Then Sue Media for ‘Vigilante Justice’
Alan Dershowitz, no matter what you think of him as a person, carries a lot of weight when it comes to the Constitution and laws of the United States.
In a recent interview with Newsmax, Dershowitz accused CNN, The New York Times and the left-wing media in general of playing a vigilante role in the high-profile Kyle Rittenhouse case. He also said that Rittenhouse should be acquitted.
Final arguments in the Rittenhouse trial are underway as of this writing. I, like many Americans, watched the proceedings on television with great interest. In my opinion, the majority of Americans, regardless of their political affiliation, would agree with Dershowitz.
Rittenhouse was charged with first-degree reckless murder, among other counts. If all of the initial charges the prosecution brought against Rittenhouse were unsuccessful, he would face 170 years in prison. Rittenhouse is 18 years old this year.
Dershowitz, professor emeritus at Harvard Law School, believes there are clear grounds for reasonable doubt in the case and that Rittenhouse acted in self-defence.
There is a lot of rich video footage of the night mentioned. It speaks for itself. Reporter Drew Hernandez filmed one of the videos and was also a defense witness at the trial, as reported National rating.
WARNING: The following video depicts violent imagery that some people will find offensive.
Once acquitted, according to Dershowitz, Rittenhouse should sue liberal news outlets for repeatedly falsely reporting that he is guilty.
Will Rittenhouse be found guilty?
Yes: 7% (18 Votes)
No: 93% (233 Votes)
“Then he will sue, and that is the way to respond. Justice vigilance is what CNN is doing, not what a pressured 17-year-old could have done right or wrong. It’s CNN who participates in vigilante justice. It is The New Yorker guilty of vigilance of justice,” said Dershowitz.
Nicholas Sandmann sued CNN and others for alleged racism against him following a meeting with a Native American activist in Washington, D.C.
He eventually settled his lawsuit against CNN.
“The idea is to hold the media accountable for intentional and intentional lies,” says Dershowitz.
The liberal media are also attacking the judge in the case, Bruce Schroeder, for simply doing his job and respecting the Constitution.
“The bigger problem is that all the civil libertarians, all the libertarians, all kinds of the ACLU, The New Yorker and The New York Times, they attack the judge because simply applying the Constitution,” Dershowitz said.
These are dangerous times. The mainstream media is like the boy crying wolf when there aren’t any wolves around. Their utter disregard for truth in favor of promoting stories that promote an improbable utopia in their bid for power is steroid nihilism.
WARNING: The following clip depicts language that some people will find offensive.
But this is not a movie. It’s true.
Disrupting the settlement process for political gain is as questionable as it happens. And it humbles itself like hell. The liberal media believe that if they repeat a lie enough times, ordinary Americans will be stupid enough to believe it, even if that story contradicts the reality right in front of them. .
NS Russia-Hoax Collusion is a prime example.
It may have worked then, but it also opened the eyes of many Americans. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
The prosecution is trying to convict a young man for all the wrong reasons. That is not justice for them. It’s all about winning.
However, I firmly believe that the judges will see through the charisma.
https://www.westernjournal.com/famed-harvard-law-professor-rittenhouse-acquitted-sue-media-vigilante-justice/ | Rittenhouse ‘Should Be Acquitted’, Then Sue Media for ‘Vigilante Justice’