Hakeem Jefferson is an assistant professor of political science at Stanford College, one in every of America’s premier establishments of upper studying.
“Race is the central organizing function of American politics,” Jefferson says on his Twitter bio. “Nothing else comes shut.”
He’s a additionally prolific tweeter, having racked up over 24,000 posts on his account (and much more followers).
Jefferson clearly isn’t shy about getting consideration. However a few of his Twitters posts drew a form of consideration he didn’t respect when he determined responsible opposition to mask mandates on a trait he calls “whiteness.”
The tweets had been first reported on by Campus Reform on Thursday.
“Make no mistake, this loopy opposition to masks carrying that’s main of us (learn White ppl) to behave violently at college board conferences & council conferences & in all places else — yeah, you possibly can’t disconnect it from whiteness,” Jefferson tweeted Aug. 17. “And discussions that don’t acknowledge this are incomplete.”
“Ain’t like masks are snug for non-White folks. However you don’t see a bunch of Black of us storming conferences,” Jefferson wrote.
“And it’s not simply trigger these White of us are GOP. It’s trigger they’re White, & imagine whiteness confers upon them a form of energy that locations them above gov motion.”
He additionally compared opposition to high school masks mandates to the Jan. Capitol incursion, as a result of — nicely, “whiteness be working extra time.”
“It’s like my response to jan6. You don’t should be an professional in identification to know that whiteness is driving the conduct,” Jefferson tweeted.
“The crowds are overwhelming white. You assume this simply randomly occurred? Nah, whiteness be working extra time. Like we are saying within the south, the satan is busy!”
I’m certain he’s.
There’s some irony right here in that the primary report on Jeffries’ tweets got here from a reporter at Campus Reform, Corey Walker, who — if one is to evaluate by his profile picture — is black.
So possibly pores and skin coloration isn’t an infallible predictor of thought and conduct in spite of everything?
Liberal racists needn’t fret — Jeffries’ had a preemptive reply to this type of query in one other tweet on Aug. 20, the place Adam Serwer, a author for The Atlantic, posited that “race is a malleable fiction that’s consistently shifting with the politics of the time.”
“Jogs my memory of a v good query I received yesterday from a Stanford pupil asking me to assist reply a q he’s had come up. How can one argue, as I do, that whiteness was on the root of 1/6 given there have been Vietnamese flags and different ‘non-white’ teams represented?” he wrote.
Jeffries posted a reply which argued that whiteness is “a assemble” that’s “not merely about pores and skin coloration, though these consider themselves as white are most prone to its sights.”
“There have been, all through the course of American historical past, individuals who don’t match neatly into the class we think about white who’ve locked arms with those that do who’re dedicated to the ideology of whiteness,” he continued.
“That reality doesn’t undermine the argument that whiteness is a helluva drug that explains occasions just like the jan 6 rebel. On the contrary, it reminds us of how f’ing highly effective whiteness is. It’s so highly effective, it’s engaging to these it so typically oppresses.”
He had a unique form of reply when contacted by Walker, launching into one other Twitter thread by which he accused the author of “wilding.”
“A reporter from Campus Reform reached out to ask if I’ve any feedback on this tweet as a result of they’re writing a narrative about my feedback. I feel the tweets communicate for themselves. Wait till they hear how I train about race and injustice within the classroom!” he wrote.
“It seems, they’ve additionally reached out to the college for remark about my tweets, as if I might ever be at a college that even thought it may management the issues I say. What a joke. Free speech for me, however not for thee, I suppose,” he continued, including, “These individuals are wilding.”
Jefferson misses the purpose when he pegs this as a free speech difficulty — “as if I might ever be at a college that even thought it may management the issues I say.” Jefferson doesn’t have to fret about this. His opinions are the kind academia embraces.
On his university profile, Jefferson notes that his dissertation, “Policing Norms: Punishment and the Politics of Respectability Amongst Black People,” was co-winner of the 2020 Finest Dissertation Award from the Political Psychology Part of the American Political Science Affiliation.
Do you assume these beliefs make Professor Jefferson a racist?
Sure: 100% (24 Votes)
No: 0% (0 Votes)
Slightly, the speech difficulty is on the opposite facet — with college students who may disagree with Jefferson’s assertion that “whiteness” is behind every thing that progressives dislike in 2021 America. Mother and father who insurgent in opposition to college masks mandates, those that assume there was one thing unsuitable with the 2020 election, non-whites who do and assume issues Jefferson doesn’t approve of: All “whiteness!”
On his personal website, he writes that he’s “keenly conscious of the historical past of racism and racial violence which are core options of the American venture.” His analysis focuses on “a cautious theoretical framework and novel measure of respectability that assist make sense of Black People’ assist for tough-on-crime legal guidelines and punitive social welfare insurance policies.” (Which in all probability consists of “whiteness,” too.)
When questioned out on these beliefs, his response is that the reporter who did it’s “wilding.”
Think about, then, if you happen to’re one in every of his college students. Like so many different conservatives on college campuses, your free speech might be severely certified — because it’s clear that Jefferson thinks that form of “free speech” smacks extremely of “whiteness.”
So, be a great pupil, put on your masks and nod alongside. And whenever you discuss why you’re carrying masks, make certain to say that opposition to masks mandates is inseparable from “whiteness.” As Prof. Jefferson says, any dialogue that doesn’t acknowledge that is incomplete.
You wouldn’t wish to be incomplete, would you?
https://www.westernjournal.com/prof-top-university-says-whiteness-responsible-opposition-school-mask-mandates/ | Prof at Prime College Says ‘Whiteness’ Is Answerable for Opposition to College Masks Mandates