Within the case of the priest, it appears Grindr collected delicate data and handed it alongside to 3rd events, who may in flip have handed it to different events, till ultimately it landed within the arms of a knowledge dealer: one in all many firms that hoover up private knowledge and spit it again out to prospects. (Grindr disputes that it’s the supply of the information.) Precisely the route that data traveled is unsure, as a result of there are few guidelines of the street. One thing comparable occurs to most smartphone customers most days as they faucet on digital jewels of candies for prime scores, or as they test the climate. Data together with their location is gathered and offered, normally for the top goal of promoting: to greet individuals who just lately went to nightclubs with offers on occasion clothes, as an illustration, or to lure them into a close-by retailer.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/08/01/privacy-is-fiction-internet-age-priests-case-proves-it/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=wp_opinions | Opinion | Privateness is a fiction within the Web age. A priest’s case proves it.