In a brand new counterclaim towards Alan Dershowitz, Netflix alleges that the Harvard legislation professor is maliciously trying to impede its free train of speech.
The dispute issues Filthy Wealthy, the docuseries that examines convicted and deceased intercourse offender Jeffrey Epstein. Dershowitz as soon as represented Epstein and has confronted an allegation of sexual misconduct himself.
In March, Dershowitz objected to a “intentionally one-sided narrative” in a suit that included a libel claim in addition to contract and fraudulent inducement causes of motion primarily based on the settlement for an interview.
Now, Netflix hits again. The streamer says Filthy Wealthy precisely reported on public court docket filings, is due to this fact privileged as a real and truthful report of judicial proceedings, that it relied on producers to reality test and talk with Dershowitz, that he signed a launch and that he was beforehand placed on discover of asserting frivolous claims with prior threats.
“Netflix is entitled to compensatory damages and punitive damages as a result of Dershowitz commenced this motion for the aim (and, certainly, for the only objective) of harassing, intimidating, punishing, or in any other case maliciously inhibiting Netflix’s free train of speech and petition,” states the counterclaim (read in full here).
The streamer, represented by Rachel Strom at Davis Wright Tremaine, is utilizing an amended anti-SLAPP law handed final yr in New York to gasoline its counterclaim towards Dershowitz. This explicit invocation of the anti-SLAPP deserves particular notation as a result of it is available in a federal court docket in Florida. Which will include some scrutiny because the litigation strikes ahead.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/television/tv-news/netflix-seeks-punitive-damages-alan-dershowitz-1234991882/ | Netflix Seeks Punitive Damages for Alan Dershowitz Harassment – The Hollywood Reporter