Judge BANS MSNBC from Rittenhouse Courtroom After ‘Extremely Serious’ Attempt to Unmask the Jury

Judge Bruce Schroeder revealed the “extremely serious” development in the Rittenhouse case that an MSNBC producer committed a sinister act of trying to unmask the Rittenhouse case jurors by following the juror bus their group.

The judge in the high-profile case explained what happened and then barred MSNBC from participating in court.

“Last night, someone identified himself as James J. Morrison and stated that he was an NBC news producer, working for MSNBC… and under the supervision of someone named Irene Byon in NY for MSNBC, “The judge began.

“The police stopped him because he was watching from a distance of about a block,” he continued. “And ran a red light. Drag him over and ask him what’s going on. ”

“And he gave that information. And he said he was instructed by Miss Byon to follow the jury bus,” the judge added. “The matter is under further investigation at this time. It’s the newest one I have.”

“He was fined for violating traffic control signals,” he continued. “He is not here today, as far as I know. I have instructed that no one from MNSBC News will be allowed into this building for the duration of this trial. This is a very serious matter and I don’t know what the ultimate truth of it is, but absolutely wouldn’t think of someone following the jury bus, it’s a very, very, very, very, very serious problem. extremely serious,” concluded the judge.

The Rittenhouse case has become a focal point of racial and political tension largely due to biased and dishonest media coverage. Radical journalists at left-wing agencies are once again trying to spark racing riots. But this brazen attempt by an MSNBC employee to find out more information about jurors threatens to cause “confusion with prejudice.”

Irene Byon was discovered to be a producer on NBC. After the judge named her during the trial, she’nuked‘ her LinkedIn account. This is sufficient proof that MSNBC has, indeed, crossed state lines to forge a jury.

Judge Schroeder praised the media coverage of Wednesday’s Rittenhouse trial.

“NBC Nightly News edits Judge Schroeder’s scathing criticism of the media and their ‘scary’ coverage of the Rittenhouse case,” noted MRC’s Nicholas Fondacaro. mistakenly stated that the judge was only talking about ‘public criticism of the attorneys’ by both parties.”

The judge is considering whether to rule the Rittenhouse case.mistaken with prejudice“Following the defense’s move indicated that the state had withheld video evidence potentially punitive that could wipe out its client.

The defense team’s motion was shared by Human Events Senior Editor Jack Posobiec late Tuesday night. It revealed misconduct by the prosecution that had the potential to lead to “wrongful bias.”

The petition argues that the state has “repeatedly violated Court guidelines, acted in bad faith, and knowingly provided technological evidence other than their own.”

Finally, the petition states that “the defendant respectfully requests the Court to find that “excessive infringement in accordance with the prosecution’s instructions” exists, that “the excessive infringement is intentional and not in good faith.” opinion,” and thereby bringing the defendant’s motion to be prejudicial misconduct.

As previously reported, there are many who believe that jurors are under threat. Reportedly, two of the jurors were scared to deliver their verdict, citing “backlash,” according to Human Events Senior Editor. Jack Posobiec, who said his source was a US Marshal in Kenosha.

They “worry about the media leaking their names, while it happens to their families, jobs, etc.,” he added. Posobiec also said concerns include “doxxing threats from ‘anarchist groups’.”

Famously, Black Lives Matter activists were arrested trying to offend jurors in this case.

“There was someone there in the pick-up truck this morning [who] is a video recorded by the jury. The officers approached the person and asked him… to delete the video, “Judge Bruce Schroeder told his courtroom on Tuesday. “If it happens again,” the police were “instructed to get the phone” used to record the trial, the judge added.

A prominent Minneapolis BLM activist named Cortez Rice, who appeared to be close to George Floyd, said ominously that the jury was being watched.

“Cortez Rice, a BLM activist in Minnesota, said on video that jurors in the Kenosha trial Kyle Rittenhouse being photographed,” Wisconsin Right Now reported.

“The names of the jurors in the trial have been sealed by the judge making them more difficult to deceive,” the report added. : However, the public has access to court proceedings, where jurors sit in plain sight. Only press photographers are allowed in the courtroom. “

However, Rice tells a different story on video.

“I won’t even name the people I know who participated in the Kenosha trial. But it’s the camera in there. It definitely has a camera there. There are definitely people taking pictures of juries and all that,” Rice said in the video.

Rice later claimed that he had no idea that people were watching Rittenhouse’s jurors.

Even the judge in the Rittenhouse case was not safe from threats in self-defense in the form of threatening emails.

“Sir, I didn’t know that under the black cloak of justice you wear a white robe of the klan,” one email read. “There is no way that a fair trial can be heard under your supervision. Better yet, resign.”

“Enjoy your tenure, rate it, it will be your LAST,” another read. “If I ever meet you in person, I fully intend to spit in your face, no matter the cost. You’re disgusting.”

“Be sure and tell Schroeder how useless he is,” one email said. “He’ll officially find out when his heart shrank in a few years and he’ll have to stand before a real judge.”

Schroeder said he has received “thousands of communications”. He promises that he will “deal with” those who send threatening emails. “I don’t want to be like that,” he added.

On Tuesday, Tucker Carlson argued that the juries did not come up with a “clear verdict” because they feared that “Biden voters” would riot.

“The average jury,” says Carlson, “will reach a verdict in just a few hours, so these jurors take longer than most, but perhaps not because the evidence they heard was doing. they are confused.”

Tucker argued that the ruling was so clear that “no honest person could have come to a different conclusion” as Rittenhouse did in his own defense.

“The question is why did it take so long for this jury to come up with a very clear verdict?” Carlson asked. “Want answers? Well, look outside the courtroom. There are hundreds of National Guard soldiers assembled tonight in Kenosha. Why are they there? Well, they came in the case of Kyle Rittenhouse being acquitted. “

“If he is acquitted, pretty much everyone would expect the normal mob of Joe Biden voters to burn, loot and destroy,” he continued. “Why is everyone expecting this? Because the people on the left are openly calling for it.”

While Kenosha is currently home to racial and political tensions, and with threats made by Black Lives Matter activists against jurors, the network is looking to unmask those that juror and open them up to more direct threats.

MSNBC has now gone beyond a biased news source. It is a national threat to public safety.

https://smartzune.com/judge-bans-msnbc-from-rittenhouse-courtroom-after-extremely-serious-attempt-to-expose-jurors/ Judge BANS MSNBC from Rittenhouse Courtroom After ‘Extremely Serious’ Attempt to Unmask the Jury


Inter Reviewed is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – admin@interreviewed.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button