Democratic lawmakers have hit a dead end in their efforts to counter the GOP’s disenfranchisement campaign. They did speak out passionately against it. They did Invoice introduction to protect and extend voting rights. The White House launch an effort over the summer to address voter suppression. But the reality has been clear for a while: If the problem remains the same – and there is no good reason to think it won’t – then no legislative solution is realistic in the split Senate. .
So where will that take them, and the democratic process, into mid-2022 and beyond? The burden may fall on the base again Turn off in numbers large enough to pass laws that the GOP states have enacted to make voting more difficult. But the Justice Department has also recently been more assertive in fighting state expropriation laws, with Merrick Garland file a lawsuit against Georgia and Texas challenging provisions of the anti-vote bills they introduced this year.
The attorney general’s most recent lawsuit came Monday, alleging that Texas discriminated against Black and Latino voters in redrawing its county map and in doing so violated Section 2 of the Act. Voting Rights Act. The state issued the redistricting plan through an “extremely rapid and opaque” process, the DOJ alleged in complaint, and plotting its maps with “discriminatory intent” to dilute the impact of minority voters. “These redistricting plans will reduce the opportunity for Latino and Black voters in Texas to elect their preferred representative,” Attorney General Vanita Gupta speak Second. “And that’s prohibited by federal law.”
“This is not the first time Texas has acted to reduce the voting rights of minority citizens,” Gupta continued, noting that courts have found discriminatory redistricting practices. decade after decade” in the state. “The Attorney General has made it clear that the Department of Justice will not stand idly by in the face of illegal attempts to restrict access to the ballot.” (Ken Paxton, Texas attorney general, dismiss the case as an “unreasonable” attempt by the administration to “control Texas voters.”)
The DOJ can actually “commit” to protecting voting rights. But how effectively can the department operate, and will these legal challenges suffice on their own without legislation? There’s still much more to see. Even as he filed another lawsuit against Texas, Garland alluded to one of the biggest setbacks to his case: gutting, in 2013. Shelby v. Holder, of the front clearance. Like CNN note, that request would subject the redistricting of Texas to federal approval; without it, the burden of proof would rest with the department showing that the new maps were discriminatory. In announcing the lawsuit, Garland urged lawmakers to reinstate the request. “I would like to once again urge Congress to restore the Justice Department’s prior clearance,” speak Second. “If that clearance still exists, we probably wouldn’t be here today to report this claim.”
But the odds of getting enough Republicans on it are probably about the same as having enough of them to support other measures to ensure the voting process against the kind of crap that their party adopted as an electoral strategy. “What we are facing now is a very real and serious case of subversion of democracy,” said Democrat Stacey Abrams, who announced his second run for governor of Georgia last week, told NS New York Times last weekend. There have been admirable efforts to push back, including from the January 6 committee, which is pushing remove ambiguity from the voting tabulation law that Donald Trump tried to exploit to turn his 2020 loss into Joe Biden. Again, however, there is little reason to be optimistic that any legislative amendment has a realistic chance with the current Senate.
In the absence of meaningful action on Capitol Hill, thanks to outcry, the DOJ’s challenges are welcome measures. But like Jennifer Rubin note inside Washington Post On Tuesday, government actions failed to prevent Republicans from regaining American rights. Rubin wrote: “The Department of Justice cannot defend our democracy alone. “The Senate and the White House have long had to give them the tools they need to combat a wholesale attempt to artificially strengthen white voting rights.”
Better stories from Vanity Fair
– Why is the right to an intestinal abortion possible Damaging SCOTUS’s own legitimacy
– Jared and Ivanka Try going back to polite society
– Potential East Hampton Airport closure Ignites Class War
– ONE $2.5 billion plan to Thwart COVID Variants Stalled Inside the Biden Administration
– Mark Meadows, Who Knows Trump’s Body Burial, in cooperation
– Meet the Lawyers Try to book Ghislaine Maxwell Free
– Twitter’s Jack Dorsey has exited—Or was he fired??
– Trump’s Stealing Ability the 2024 election is just creeping up
– From the Repository: Twitter Constants Chaos
– Not a subscriber? Join Vanity Fair to get full access to VF.com and the entire online archive now.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/12/joe-biden-doj-voter-suppression-merrick-garland Joe Biden’s DOJ Can’t Fight Voter Suppression On Its Own