If the Trump years taught conservatives something, it was to watch out for so-called whistleblowers, as a result of they at all times appear to have a liberal agenda motivating them.
Such seems to be the case with the “Fb whistleblower,” Frances Haugen, who testified earlier than the Senate’s Subcommittee on Shopper Safety, Product Security, and Information Safety on Tuesday to nice fanfare.
The highest headline of the entire thing was that she was alarmed concerning the dangerous impact of Facebook and Instagram on kids, and she or he might be, however in the event you dig a bit of deeper and pay attention carefully, suppressing political speech is numerous what she’s about.
It was proper in her opening statement, when Haugen claimed that Fb’s merchandise “stoke division and weaken our democracy.”
The Federalist reported that she joined Fb in 2019 “on the situation of being tasked with censoring ‘misinformation,’” and labored on a 200-member civic integrity unit, the place she continued till after the 2020 election.
Haugen’s staff “was tasked with countering so-called misinformation (learn: throttling politically disfavored content material)” concerning the election, in keeping with The Federalist.
Does the time period “misinformation” within the fall of 2020 ring a bell?
What if I add Hunter Biden as a clue?
In October, Fb and Twitter censored the bombshell story first broke by the New York Post, calling it misinformation.
“Fb coverage comms director Andy Stone on Twitter and CEO Mark Zuckerberg in congressional testimony admitted to the corporate suppressing the bombshell report,” The Federalist reported.
Stone tweeted his views in October 2020.
Whereas I’ll deliberately not hyperlink to the New York Put up, I would like be clear that this story is eligible to be truth checked by Fb’s third-party truth checking companions. Within the meantime, we’re decreasing its distribution on our platform.
— Andy Stone (@andymstone) October 14, 2020
Haugen admitted in a back-and-forth with Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota that she needs Fb had saved the identical “safeguards” in place relating to political speech after the election because it had within the lead-up to it.
“Fb modified these security defaults within the run-up to the election as a result of they knew [the engagements] had been harmful,” Haugen stated. “And since they wished that progress again, they wished the acceleration of the platform again after the election, they returned to their authentic defaults.”
Frances Haugen: “Fb modified these security defaults within the run-up to the election as a result of they knew they had been harmful. And, as a result of they wished that progress again, they wished the acceleration of the platform again after the election, they returned to their authentic defaults.” pic.twitter.com/P5GEIFrxOh
— CSPAN (@cspan) October 5, 2021
FEC records present that Haugen is a liberal, so that’s little question the speech she doesn’t discover harmful.
She contributed a number of occasions throughout the 2020 election cycle and since to left-wing teams just like the Democratic Senatorial Marketing campaign Committee and ActBlue, which helps Democratic candidates and progressive teams elevate cash.
“In a earlier function at Pinterest, Frances Haugen was behind a ‘latest change to provide customers the choice to filter searches to particular pores and skin tones,’” The Daily Wire reported.
And whereas employed at Gigster, she gave a presentation on how “if we don’t construct with an eye fixed in the direction of inclusion, we will find yourself enshrining bias.”
Do you suppose regulating Fb might be a entice for conservatives?
Sure: 89% (216 Votes)
No: 11% (26 Votes)
Fox Information host Laura Ingraham warned Republican lawmakers on Tuesday that the push to manage Fb is trying like a entice.
“God assist any Republican who would help” Democrats in empowering social media firms to clamp down conservatives, she stated on “The Ingraham Angle.”
“The actual fact is Republicans could also be strolling straight right into a entice,” the Fox host defined. “The left’s actual beef with Fb has nothing to do with the kids. The children are on TikTok, aren’t they? The left doesn’t like Fb as a result of Fb has refused to suppress all conservative speech. That’s it.”
“The left has determined to drive conservatives off of the web, they usually’re afraid Fb gained’t be sufficiently loyal to their plans.”
Ingraham argued the suppression of speech will all be executed within the identify of “stopping home terrorism” or sustaining neighborhood peace in a approach akin to one thing communist China would do.
The left’s actual objective, she argued, is a “land the place we’re silenced and theirs are the one voices heard.”
Ingraham makes an astute statement.
Haugen is not any whistleblower; she’s clearly a Democratic operative selling an anti-free speech agenda, which needs to be rejected.
https://www.westernjournal.com/looks-like-facebook-whistleblower-pro-democrat-operative-key-woke-role-big-tech-companies/ | It Seems to be Just like the Fb Whistleblower Is a Professional-Democrat Operative, Had Key Woke Function at Different Huge Tech Firms