Here’s one thing that hasn’t changed in the past five years: Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt We still hash out their divorce. And the case does not appear to be accelerating any time soon. On Friday, an appeals court ruled that the couple’s judge should be disqualified.
California’s 2nd District Court of Appeals agreed with Jolie’s group’s claims that Judge John W. Orderkirk did not fully disclose the business relationship with Pitt’s attorneys. As such, the couple’s battle for custody of five children is “nearly over” according to Related press, “Maybe just the beginning.”
“The conduct of Judge Ouderkirk, considered in conjunction with disclosed information regarding his recent professional relationships with Pitt’s attorney, could cause an objective person, knowing all the facts, it is reasonable to entertain doubts about the judge’s ability to be fair,” said the court. “Disqualification is mandatory,” they concluded.
Ouderkirk, a retired superior court judge, personally employed by Pitt and Jolie, seems to be a common occurrence among celebrity couples. (NS main motivation because hiring a private judge is expensive to keep the proceedings as private as possible.)
Jolie asked Ouderkirk to remove himself End of August. A lower court said her request came too late, but she appealed.
To give you an idea of how long this whole thing has been going on, when Jolie first filed for divorce from Pitt, the number one movie at the box office to be Sully, and Chainsmokers’ “Closer” featuring Halsey was at the top NS Billboards Hot 100 chart. In other words, it was quite a while ago. (September 15, 2016 to be precise.)
The couple is said to have a discriminatory judgment, meaning their marriage has been officially declared over while they finalize the other issues of their divorce. As such, they are officially declared single in April 2019, while other issues, particularly custody of their five children, worked their way through the system.
Friday decided to come two months after the court gave Pitt and Jolie joint 50-50 custody. That judgment is now vacant. “We will continue to do what is legally necessary based on detailed findings about what is best for children,” a rep for Pitt said.
Better stories from Vanity Fair
– Story cover: Dua Lipa on Creating Future nostalgia
– Inside Ghislaine Maxwell’s Battle With the Bureau of Prisons
– Prince William and Prince Harry “Move a new page” in their relationship
– 11 books we think you should read This July
– Inside LA’s Most Iconic Examples of mid-century modern architecture
– Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez are ready to spend “The rest of their lives together”
– Must-see looks From Cannes Film Festival 2021
– History of Princess Diana’s fiery family
– NS Best musician-tested waterproof mascara for a summer outing on horseback
– From the Repository: The heart of an heir
– Registration for Purchase line to receive curated fashion, book, and beauty listings in a weekly newsletter.
https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2021/07/in-neverending-divorce-angelina-jolie-and-brad-pitt-must-now-shop-for-new-judge | In Neverending Divorce, Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt Must Now Shop for New Judge