His new target is the biggest fish of them all
In 2018, Nick Sandmann identified himself as the subject of national scorn after a selectively edited clip showed him smiling awkwardly while a Native American activist banged a drum in front of him. his face amid a rowdy confrontation between several parties outside the Washington Monument after March for Life.
Sandmann, wearing the MAGA hat along with many of his colleagues Student at Covington High School, was described by several prominent newspapers as mocking the activist. Those sellers should absolutely know better than to enhance their report from a short clip that has gone viral on Twitter.
Some of these stores have paid dearly for their bad reporting since then – and Sandmann is set for life.
In his case, it was the establishment’s media syndicate, taking cues from the outraged Twitter crowd, that turned the narrative implying Sandmann wasn’t what he wasn’t.
In Kyle’s case Rittenhousehowever, the person was portrayed by the established media as a white extremist militia member after shooting three rioters in self-defense when Kenosha was set on fire following the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020. The inevitable defamation clothing will target a larger target: the presidents of the states.
Todd McMurtry, who helped Sandman achieve a heavy defamation deal with CNN, told Fox News last week that he thinks Rittenhouse most likely has a strong case against current President Joe Biden, who used the image of the teenager and hinted that he was a black supremacist. white in the 2020 campaign.
Not only do Proposal Biden that Rittenhouse was a white supremacist on CNN shortly after the teen shot dead three rioters in self-defense during last year’s fiery riots, the candidate also posted pictures of Kyle with a rifle style his AR-15 in a video he tweeted out as part of a video about white nationalists and Proud Boys in Charlottesville and elsewhere, along with the sound of Chris Wallace asked Trump to reject white supremacists.
There’s no other way to explain it: The President of the United States refused to disavow white supremacists on the debate stage last night. pic.twitter.com/Q3VZTW1vUV
– Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) September 30, 2020
Another suggestion is far from subtle – Rittenhouse is depicted as a white man running for president.
Should Rittenhouse sue President Biden?
Yes: 99% (343 Votes)
No: 1% (2 votes)
And when Rittenhouse was found not guilty by a jury in Kenosha of murder and attempted murder on November 19 after it was fully established that he has no way to go against the white supremacist ideology, which is a sitting president with eggs on his face.
“What you get from that tweet is Kyle Rittenhouse used his rifle and engaged in white supremacist misconduct, so it’s actionable,” McMurtry said, adding that Such a case does not “necessarily win, but it can act.”
The attorney also noted that because Biden was not yet president at the time, he would not be able to benefit from any kind of executive or congressional immunity.
Fox notes that Rittenhouse’s mother, Wendy, accuse the president slandered her son “because of the vote.”
“I was very angry with him and what he did to my son. He slandered him,” she said during an appearance on “Hannity” earlier this month.
My Rittenhouse is beautiful manual dismantling Biden’s brazen suggestion he was a racist during a lengthy sit-down with Fox’s Tucker Carlson last week.
“Mr. President, if I could say one thing to you, I would urge you to go back and watch the trial and understand the facts before making a statement,” said the teenager, going further in describing it. is “real malice, defamation of my character, to him.”
He’s certainly not wrong.
President Biden, like so many other members of his party, failed to capitalize on false allegations against a teenager who defended his life by using a gun he was authorized to carry. legally after he appeared to help protect private property and administer aid during a violent protest in which the then-candidate was criticized for being too slow to ascend. judgment.
All of this was to accuse his opponent, then-President Trump, of refusing to deny white supremacy – something Trump has done many times and with no certain conditions.
As Carlson noted to Rittenhouse, being called a vile racist who believes in the kind of disgusting ideology that has resulted in millions of deaths at the hands of psychotic tyrants is “a no-brainer.” small”. In fact, neither Rittenhouse nor millions of left-wing American voters like to slander with the same terminology holds those beliefs.
Biden could be sued – but he and others who abuse this very serious charge must be held accountable to the full public for their blatant lies on a much larger scale if we there is any chance of removing the status of the American ascent from the low real estate that it has plummeted.
https://www.westernjournal.com/lawyer-got-nick-sandmann-settlement-cnn-weighs-rittenhouse-new-target-biggest-fish/ His new target is the biggest fish of them all