Business

Facebook, Apple cases raises questions about the definition of a monopoly

blank

On this occasion, she accepted neither firm’s market definition. Epic sought to argue Apple is a “monopoly of 1,” she mentioned, by arguing Apple is a monopolist over its personal system of distributing apps by itself units within the App Retailer, in addition to its in-app fee system. Apple, in the meantime, argued that the court docket ought to concentrate on the whole video video games market, wherein each firms compete. Gonzalez Rogers determined to focus particularly on transactions in cellular video games.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/expertise/2021/09/10/gonzale-zrogers-epic-apple-facebook-bigtech-monopoly/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=wp_business | Fb, Apple instances raises questions concerning the definition of a monopoly

snopx

Inter Reviewed is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – admin@interreviewed.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

19 − ten =

Back to top button