On this occasion, she accepted neither firm’s market definition. Epic sought to argue Apple is a “monopoly of 1,” she mentioned, by arguing Apple is a monopolist over its personal system of distributing apps by itself units within the App Retailer, in addition to its in-app fee system. Apple, in the meantime, argued that the court docket ought to concentrate on the whole video video games market, wherein each firms compete. Gonzalez Rogers determined to focus particularly on transactions in cellular video games.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/expertise/2021/09/10/gonzale-zrogers-epic-apple-facebook-bigtech-monopoly/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=wp_business | Fb, Apple instances raises questions concerning the definition of a monopoly