CNN’s Jim Acosta has pushed Senate Democrats to scrap the filtering rule, requiring 60 votes to move most legislation, so they can pass his agenda along party lines. .
In making his pitch on his Saturday show, Acosta announced that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell would do the same if he and the Republicans were in power.
“Democrats might think of it this way: If Mitch McConnell were in their position, what would he do? For what we know, will we see him leave the movie alone? Are movies more important than suffrage, women’s rights? ” Acosta asked in an explicit reference to HR-1 — the Democratic Party’s effort to overhaul federal elections and wrest them from the control of state legislatures as outlined in the Constitution. France.
Acosta: Democrats might think of it this way: If Mitch McConnell were in their place, what would he do? For what we know, will we see him leave the movie alone? Movies are more important than voting rights, women’s rights… pic.twitter.com/90ZwDIoAdT
– Acyn (@Acyn) December 4, 2021
But the presenter seemed to have forgotten that in the six-year period when McConnell and the Republicans took control of the Senate, they never moved to give up.
As @Acosta play strategist Dem here – trying to make up a silly excuse to destroy the Senate – remember that CNN bills this as straight news, not opinion.
You would expect a top political reporter to remember that McConnell was in D’s position a YEAR ago, didn’t bother. https://t.co/EJJbncr1lo
– Matt Whitlock (@mattdizwhitlock) December 4, 2021
The Daily Wire adds:
Despite the power to end filming – and the rumors that followed-President Donald Trump would want him to do so on multiple occasions – McConnell refrained from doing so.
Trump is said to have used the same argument against McConnell that Acosta used Saturday, telling him that if he didn’t close the debate, then (and now) Senate Minority Leader as Majority Leader) Chuck Schumer (D-NY) certainly will.
“I don’t think the legislative problem, which has been around for a long time, is a problem. And I think, in many cases, it creates a kind of bipartisan solution, and I don’t think that’s always bad for the country. We actually have pretty big differences on some things, but there’s a lot of things we do together,” McConnell said. told Politico in 2018.
“I think both sides, having been up and down many times, understand the advantage when you don’t have a majority,” he continued.
“What I remind the president from time to time when we discuss this is but because of that we are going to socialize medicine. [and] McConnell added.
Stores additionally note:
While McConnell is not willing to implement unilateral rule changes in the Senate on his own, he is willing to use unilateral changes introduced by his predecessor, former Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) – The changes he had warned of years earlier would return. bite the Democrats if they’ve pushed them through.
Reid instituted the so-called Nuclear Option – which allows federal judges to be confirmed by a simple majority rather than requesting 60 ordinary votes, thus avoiding opposition – in 2013 in the face of opposition. McConnell: “You’re going to regret this, and you might regret it a lot sooner than you think. ”
That turned out to be prophetic: McConnell expanded the nuclear option to put an unprecedented number of Trump-nominated federal judges on the bench alongside three Supreme Court justices: Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.
Source link CNN’s Jim Acosta Pushed Senate Democrats To Ditch Filibuster, Claims Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell Would Want If He Could – But Forgets Vital Host Details