Brooke Shields called her 1980 interview with Barbara Walters “Criminal Reality”

Forty years later, Brooke shields reflected on how she was treated like a 15-year-old after participating in a sexually aroused Calvin Klein campaign, labeling the entire experience as completely “crazy”.

The pattern appeared on Dax Shepard‘NS Armchair specialist audio file to discuss the infamous 1980s commercials and how she was treated by the media because of them. In what has now become one of the brand’s most iconic campaigns, the then 15-year-old Shields posed various poses in Calvin Klein jeans, sporting different bras, include: “Want to know what happens between me and my Calvins? Is not.”

That line scandalized much of America, prompting Calvin Klein to send the model on a press tour in an effort to minimize the backlash. As part of that tour, Shields was interviewed by Barbara Walters and was asked some intrusive, personal questions about her sexual history. While discussing the sexualization of young celebrities on the podcast, Shepard deemed Walters’ interview “sad” and Shields agreed that it was “criminal in fact” and “not newsworthy” solstice”.

The previous model also spoke out about her unfair treatment as a young girl in a video for Vogue from October. Of the experience, she said, “I was away when they all came out, and then started hearing, ‘Oh, ads are banned here, and Canada won’t play them.” And the paparazzi and the people screaming at me and shouting at my mom, ‘How can you?’ It just makes me absurd, the whole thing. ” She continued, “They took an ad, it’s a rhetorical question. I was naive, I didn’t think anything of it. I don’t think it has anything to do with underwear, I don’t think it’s original. I would say about my sister, “No one can come between me and my sister.”

She added that she was shocked by the public reaction to the campaign at the time, which resulted in her often being “reprimanded” in public by those who thought she did it on purpose. that. “I think the assumption is that I know a lot more than the fact,” she admits. “If they had a double invader intent, they wouldn’t have explained it to me. If they explained it to me, why? Do they want me to say otherwise? It doesn’t fascinate me, it doesn’t get into my psyche because it’s anything overly sexual, sexualized in any way. However, she concluded that “There was an undeniable appeal to it, and they tapped right into it. They knew exactly what they were doing, and I think that’s it. has resonated for decades.”

Better stories from Vanity Fair

– Resurrection by Guru Jagat
– Billie Eilish Sit for Same interview for the fifth year
– How Princess Charlene’s Illness Becoming an International Mystery?
– Experiment by Ghislaine Maxwell: A A fresh look at Epstein’s MO
– The Best gifts for women Give and Take this holiday season
– Internet reception Donald Trump Jr. and LeBron James
– 72 hours Inside the Spend-athon at Art Basel Miami Beach
– The Renaissance of Claire’s Y2K Beauty Aesthetic Here
– From the Archive: The Paradoxical Life and Death of Robert Maxwell
– Registration for “Purchase Line” to receive curated lists of fashion, books, and beauty supplies in a weekly newsletter.