Biden Brings Ultimate Dishonor as Final Military Move in Afghanistan Appears to Be a Gruesome War Crime

Three days after a suicide bomber killed 13 U.S. service members and roughly 170 Afghanistan civilians outdoors the Hamid Karzai Worldwide Airport in Kabul in August, the U.S. army was on excessive alert.

It had acquired intelligence indicating that the terrorist group referred to as ISIS-Okay, which had claimed duty for the deadly blast, was planning a second strike.

On Sunday, Aug. 29, someday earlier than the last U.S. evacuation flight left Afghanistan, the army carried out a drone strike on a goal it stated was heading for a second airport assault.

On the time, U.S. Central Command spokesman Navy Capt. Invoice City issued an announcement explaining that: “U.S. army forces carried out a self-defense unmanned over-the-horizon airstrike at the moment on a automobile in Kabul, eliminating an imminent ISIS-Okay menace to Hamid Karzai Worldwide Airport.

“We’re assured we efficiently hit the goal. Important secondary explosions from the automobile indicated the presence of a considerable quantity of explosive materials.”


Hospital Finds Itself Unable to Deliver Babies After Nurses Resign in Protest

The assertion additionally stated the army is “assessing the probabilities of civilian casualties, although we’ve got no indications right now.”

Later that day, City issued an replace that stated the army is “conscious of experiences of civilian casualties following” the strike which the army was “nonetheless assessing.”

The assertion continued: ” … we all know [the strike] disrupted an imminent ISIS-Okay menace to the airport. We all know that there have been substantial and highly effective subsequent explosions ensuing from the destruction of the automobile, indicating a considerable amount of explosive materials inside which will have brought on further casualties. It’s unclear what might have occurred, and we’re investigating additional.”

Now, there are severe questions being raised in regards to the U.S. motion.

Do you imagine the Biden administration wants to offer an evidence for the conflicts in these accounts?

The New York Times — an overtly left-leaning publication that has slavishly supported the Biden administration — carried out an investigation into the drone strike and concluded that, somewhat than hitting a terrorist engaged in an assault, it had killed an harmless man. The Instances additionally reported seven youngsters had been killed. The Pentagon acknowledges solely three civilian deaths, in line with the Instances.

The Instances produced the video beneath based mostly on what it stated have been over a dozen interviews with the sufferer’s household and associates and pictures from safety cameras at his place of job and elsewhere. The reporters “pieced collectively [his] actions within the hours earlier than he was killed.”

In line with the video, a 20-pound Hellfire missile struck a automobile in a densely populated residential neighborhood in Kabul and 10 folks have been killed. Among the many useless have been Zamarai Ahmadi, 43, three of his sons and one daughter.

The army believed that Ahmadi was a “facilitator for the Islamic State and that his automobile was filled with explosives.”

The Instances discovered he was truly a long-time assist employee. Ahmadi was {an electrical} engineer by coaching who labored for a California-based NGO that fights malnutrition all over the world, in line with the video.


Heartbroken Gold Star Father Asks Devastating Question Biden Can’t Answer

The narrator stated that “what was interpreted because the suspicious strikes of a terrorist might have simply been a median day in his life. And it’s doable that what the army noticed Ahmadi loading into his automobile might have been water canisters he was bringing dwelling to his household, not explosives.”

There was a water scarcity in his neighborhood, the Instances was advised.

The video exhibits Ahmadi distributing his NGO’s meals to camps for displaced Afghans within the hours earlier than he was killed.

Main Gen. William Taylor is proven briefing the press on the Pentagon. He tells reporters that the strike set off “important secondary explosions from the focused automobile indicated the presence of a considerable quantity of explosive supplies.”

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Workers Mark Milley echoes Taylor’s remarks.

But, in line with the Instances, a senior army official advised stated it was solely “possible-to-probable that explosives within the automobile brought on one other blast.”

The reporters additionally introduced three explosives specialists to the scene who all agreed the injury was according to a single explosion, adopted by a fireplace, somewhat than secondary explosions.

“All of this matches what eyewitnesses advised us,” the narrator stated. “{That a} single missile exploded and triggered a big fireplace.”

“The following morning [Aug. 30], ISIS-Okay did launch rockets on the airport from a residential space Ahmadi had pushed by means of yesterday. And the automobile they used was a white Toyota.”

That is important as a result of Ahmadi additionally drove a white Toyota which was destroyed within the blast. Was this, maybe, a case of mistaken identification?



Reporters additionally discovered that, 4 days earlier than his loss of life, Ahmadi’s employer had submitted an software for Ahmadi and his household to obtain refugee resettlement within the U.S.

Above all, the army wished to forestall a second assault on the airport, which is completely comprehensible.

However, it additionally wants to offer details about why officers believed this man was a terrorist.

What intelligence had the army acquired about Ahmadi that compelled officers to order an airstrike in a crowded residential space the place civilian casualties can be a close to certainty?

Moreover, the query of whether or not there truly have been secondary explosions must be addressed.

The White Home, naturally, has remained silent on this incident, however the Biden administration wants to offer some solutions.

Whether it is proven that the army had fired a missile with out affirmation of the person’s identification — if the Instances’ reporting is correct — this may very well be main warfare crime territory.

And if the Instances’ reporting is correct, our obvious ultimate army act in Afghanistan goes to be a distinguished, tragic mistake.

Biden’s ineptitude within the withdrawal from Afghanistan has already stained our nation’s picture and standing on the world stage. Lethal motion towards harmless civilians, even when undertaken in error, would solely make it worse.

Elizabeth is a contract author at The Western Journal. Her articles have appeared on many conservative web sites together with RedState, Newsmax, The Federalist,, HotAir, Australian Nationwide Overview, Impartial Journal Overview, Instapundit, MSN and RealClearPolitics.
Please comply with Elizabeth on Twitter.

Elizabeth is a contract author at The Western Journal. Her articles have appeared on many conservative web sites together with RedState, Newsmax, The Federalist,, Australian Nationwide Overview, HotAir, Impartial Journal Overview, Instapundit, MSN and RealClearPolitics.
Please comply with Elizabeth on Twitter. | Biden Brings Final Dishonor as Remaining Navy Transfer in Afghanistan Seems to Be a Grotesque Conflict Crime

Huynh Nguyen

Inter Reviewed is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button