A former bartender says that a strip club in San Antonio fired her after she became pregnant, with managers telling her she no longer fits the “fantasy” of the establishment. this again.
The bartender, Sara Soto, alleges in a federal lawsuit filed last week that managers at — also known as the San Antonio Men’s Club — reduced her hours to zero after when she informed them she was expecting a baby. (Calls and emails to the club from The Daily Beast went unanswered. Contacted by phone, one of the owners, Theodore Dimopoulos, declined to comment.)
Soto, 31, started working at the strip club in 2017 and says she usually works five shifts a week. About two months after announcing her business during her pregnancy, she said, that’s down to three shifts a week, then two.
According to the lawsuit, Soto texted the schedule manager to inquire about reducing his shift, to which he allegedly replied, “I suppose I’ll let you go until the pregnancy is complete but but I tried to give you some shifts.” That was after she spoke with general manager Kenneth Dean, who she claims told her she no longer fits the “fantasy” of the business because no one wants to see a pregnant woman. thai at the strip club.
In May 2019, four months after she informed the business of her pregnancy, Soto said she went to work to bathe her baby and learned she had no more schedules. According to the lawsuit, she was never allowed to transfer any more cases.
Soto then filed a complaint with the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, alleging that the strip club violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against her because of her pregnant. According to the lawsuit, the EEOC found that existing evidence suggested that her pregnancy was “the motivating reason for adverse actions taken against her” and that the business “failed to provide evidence to found that the adverse actions taken against the Charger were motivated by non-discriminatory reasons”.
“As such, I find that Respondent violated Title VII by reducing the Charger’s shift, then removing her entirely from her schedule, terminating her employment due to her gender. effectively,” the decision read, according to the lawsuit.
“I suppose let you go until you’re done with the pregnancy but I tried to give you some shifts.”
The EEOC granted Soto the right to sue this summer, according to the lawsuit; It is not clear whether the agency will compensate her for damages. Soto is currently suing the business in federal district court in West Texas, seeking compensation for lost wages and emotional distress, among other things.
A similar case happened in Georgia in 2013, when an Atlanta-area stripper alleges she was kicked off the schedule the day her manager learned she was pregnant. (The two sides settled in 2015.) A service employee at Hooters also filed a complaint with the New York State Department of Human Rights in 2019, claiming that the so-called “nanny” fired her. after learning she was pregnant.
35 Bar & Grille filed a lawsuit on its own in 2013, challenging a San Antonio law that requires establishments to be classified as a “business of sexual orientation” if their female employees wear less than a bra or bikini top. The company said the law violated the dancers’ constitutional right to freedom of expression and would also cause severe economic damage to the business.
The Gentlemen’s Club lost the lawsuit, but what did it create walkie talkie Is called “world’s best written judgment.”
“If the parties choose to bring this case to trial on its merits,” U.S. District Judge Fred Biery wrote at the time, “Courts encourage reasonable exploratory intercourse as they navigate the climax and valley of the lawsuit, perhaps to achieve a happy ending. ”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/strip-club-bartender-sara-soto-says-she-was-fired-by-35-bar-and-grills-for-getting-pregnant?source=articles&via=rss | Bartender of Strip Club Sara Soto Says She Was Fired By 35 Bars & Grills Because Of Her Pregnancy