Assam border dispute: A case of cartographers’ lines vs people s perception of boundaries

Cartographers’ strains drawn on survey maps pitted towards native individuals’s notion of conventional boundaries are on the root of a slew of border disputes between Assam and states that had been carved out of it post-Independence.

With one such line drawn via a forest turning right into a flashpoint for a violent conflict between Assam and Mizoram police and civilians on Monday, Assam’s conflicts with its neighbours have come below renewed focus.

Nearly all northeastern states, barring the previous princely states of Tripura and Manipur had been carved out of Assam within the many years following India’s independence in 1947.

District borders drawn by cartographers on a 1 cm: 1 km scale turned inter-state borders for what had been until then hilly and distant districts of an enormous state.

“Generally the strains had been drawn throughout a hill, typically via a forest on maps which didn’t make clear whether or not the hill slope or forest patch via which the road went was Assam’s or its new neighbouring state’s.

“On the bottom it meant a whole lot of headache for directors as the road typically additionally clashed with a tribe’s notion of its conventional looking or grazing or jhum (shifting) cultivation lands,” identified Ranjan Chatterjee, former Chief Secretary of Meghalaya, who served Assam for a lot of his profession.

P H Hauzel, former chief secretary of Mizoram, stated land within the Lushai Hills, which is what Mizoram was referred to as earlier than 1972, when it turned a separate union territory, was managed for hundreds of years by chieftains and the areas which kind the present battle zone had been the looking grounds of a few of these chiefs.

An interior line drawn up by the British for these tribal areas in 1875 to guard tribes from influences of plainsmen seemingly sanctified these tribal claims.

“When district boundaries had been later drawn up by the British within the Thirties, a few of these conventional tribal land appeared on the opposite aspect of the boundary….this was maybe achieved as tea gardens had been encroaching on these forests,” stated Hauzel.

So long as these states remained a part of Assam, these perceptions and lack of particulars within the cartographic maps didn’t matter, as a tribe’s claims on the opposite aspect of a district’s border weren’t challenged by any authority.

Nonetheless, as these turned inter-state borders with excise and police posts, land possession on both aspect of the imaginary line turned a hotly contested situation. With populations in all states spilling over, and land in a as soon as scarcely populated a part of India turning right into a prized possession, the problem began buying financial underpinnings.

Throw in a state’s or a tribe’s sub-nationalism into the brew, and the pot typically turned a purple sizzling recipe for battle.

“Battle was typically inherent in the way in which boundaries had been drawn up when states had been created….fairly often not consistent with the inhabitants’s composition or terrain,” defined Sanjiv Sood, former extra director common of BSF.

Nagas who had been the primary to get a state of their very own in 1963, have been among the many most aggressive in demanding redrawing of maps so that every one areas the place they reside, whatever the state the place the land is positioned, are a part of Nagaland.

“Assam desires established order….the tribal states which had been carved out of it don’t agree. Every tribe has its personal historic narrative on land possession, these are sometimes at variance with the official map or one other tribe’s or a plains neighborhood’s narrative,” Chatterjee stated.

Although disputes and clashes began inside years of the brand new states coming into being, the primary main battle was in 1985, when a firefight between armed Nagas and Assam police resulted in additional than 40 individuals shedding their lives.

Assam alleges that Nagas have over time taken over greater than 60,000 hectares of forest land in Sivasagar, Golaghat and Jorhat districts, whereas Nagaland politicians declare that these had been conventional Naga lands and may by no means have been proven as a part of Assam.

Seven years after Nagaland was shaped, a separate autonomous state comprising Khasi, Garo and Jaintia hills was carved out inside Assam. In 1972, this turned a full-fledged state Meghalaya – named by the well-known linguist Suniti Chatterjee.

In the identical 12 months, the North Eastern Frontier Agency, which after 1947 had develop into a part of Assam, was renamed Arunachal Pradesh and made a Union Territory.

A North-East States Reorganisation Act handed by Parliament laid down the boundaries of those states. Nonetheless, quickly after turning into states, each Meghalaya and Arunachal disputed their borders.

Whereas Meghalaya disputed the award of a part of Mikr Hills which went to Assam, Arunachal claimed that Assam had encroached on its land.

The village of Langpih, which Meghalaya says is Garo land and Assam insists is a part of Kamrup district, turned a flashpoint in as early as 1974. Thirtysix years later it turned the location for a pitched battle between Khasis, Garos and Nepali farmers. Assam police opened fireplace, killing 4 and injuring 18 extra.

Excessive-pitched identification politics which is the norm within the northeast has continued to “compound the boundary downside”, Chatterjee famous.

Makes an attempt by successive central governments to type out the border conflicts have failed until now. The newest is a spherical of talks final week initiated by House Minister Amit Shah, who requested chief ministers to attempt to resolve their boundary conflicts within the seventy fifth 12 months of Indian Independence.

Whether or not this well-meant transfer will succeed or flounder like those earlier than due to intransigence of political leaders is one thing solely time will inform. | Assam border dispute: A case of cartographers’ strains vs individuals s notion of boundaries


Inter Reviewed is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

thirteen + sixteen =

Back to top button