- Angelina Jolie’s lawyer argued Friday to take away Decide John Ouderkirk from their custody case, alleging he was not unbiased
- Brad Pitt’s lawyer claimed Jolie’s request to take away the decide was a “delaying tactic”
- A household lawyer recommended Jolie “would by no means be submitting this enchantment” if she had been granted sole custody of their children
Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s custody battle continues, however some authorized specialists imagine the actress could also be “combating a shedding battle.”
Throughout a distant appellate courtroom listening to Friday, the “Maleficent” star’s lawyer, Robert Olson, argued to take away Decide John W. Ouderkirk from the custody case, alleging that he was not neutral and that he was engaged on authorized issues involving Pitt’s lawyer, Entertainment Tonight reported.
“Till Ms. Jolie requested, what was occurring was solely recognized to the decide, the ARC and the opposing counsel … she was shocked that this was occurring,” Olson mentioned. “Ms. Jolie didn’t know something that occurred between counsel for Pitt and the decide.”
Nevertheless, Pitt’s lawyer fired again claiming that the transfer was a “delaying tactic.”
“Right here in a toddler custody case that is been occurring for therefore lengthy, the kids are getting older, and to permit a delaying tactic like this might be extraordinarily unjust,” claimed Pitt’s lawyer, Theodore Boutrous, including, “There have been no surprises. Ms. Jolie and her counsel knew concerning the relationship and the grounds.”
Kelly Chang Rickert, a household legislation legal professional who watched the distant listening to and seems to be unrelated to the previous couple’s case, shared her ideas concerning the exes’ custody battle with ET. She recommended that the actress could also be “combating a shedding battle.”
“If Ouderkirk had sided with Angelina and granted her sole custody, she would by no means be submitting this enchantment; she wouldn’t problem his ruling as biased,” she informed the outlet. “The one motive she’s difficult it’s as a result of she misplaced. I imply, she’s struggling, she’s reaching right here.”
Rickert additionally mentioned that it was common in “bitter custody instances” like Pitt and Jolie’s for the 2 events to maintain combating till the children turn into adults.
“As a result of when the children are grown, they’re exterior the jurisdiction of the courts. Proper now, they’re combating as a result of the courts can nonetheless rule on the children. As soon as they’re 18, they’re on their very own. They’re adults,” she defined.
Jolie’s preliminary request to take away Ouderkirk from their custody case was denied in November 2020. In Might, Pitt was granted joint custody through a tentative custody order of 5 of their six kids — Pax, 17, Zahara, 16, Shiloh, 14, and 12-year-old twins Vivienne and Knox. Their eldest youngster, 19-year-old Maddox, was not topic to the choice as he’s a authorized grownup.
Jolie beforehand requested that Ouderkirk be eliminated for allegedly not disclosing his different companies with Pitt’s attorneys.
Nevertheless, Pitt’s camp insisted final 12 months that the decide “has had a well-documented historical past with the events to this continuing their counsel, together with, with out limitation, being hand-selected by Jolie to preside over the couple’s nuptials in 2014 and serving as a impartial in a number of issues involving attorneys on either side of this case.”
Ouderkirk stays the decide of their custody case as no determination has been made to take away him, ET famous.