Active College Rugby Round management on extension and homepage sites, deadlock with automated bids

IRVING, Texas – SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey has been at the DFW Hyatt Airport three times in the past few months to participate in various meetings of the College Football Tournament Administration committee.

“I had the exact same room twice in this hotel,” Sankey said. “How many rooms are there in this hotel? And I’ve had the exact same room twice. So there’s a Groundhog Day factor.”

The committee reached agreement that the knockouts should be extended, with the majority in favor of playing the games on campus. However, Brett McMurphy reported that the main issue was still automated Power Five bids, the same as in previous meetings.

Since June 10 – when a CFP working group revealed the proposed 12 team model – The 10 members that make up the FBS have met six times in the hope of reaching agreement on the details. There are many optimists that December 1 could finally be the decisive day.

“There’s no way to jump around it, we’re working on tough issues and sometimes we don’t agree,” said Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby. “I think there’s a chance for us to get to the bottom right now. We didn’t.”

The worries most likely come from The Alliance, the longstanding agreement between the ACC, Pac-12 and the Big Ten. If the 12-team knockout goes on in 2020, the Pac-12 will miss out on an auto bid in favor of AAC champion Cincinnati and Sun Belt champion Coastal Carolina. That could theoretically happen this year, since 19 San Diego and 24 Louisiana are a long way off.

“We continue to make progress, but problems remain,” Bill Hancock, the playoff’s chief executive officer, said in a statement. “The trustees will meet again to see if the remaining items can be worked out. Scalability is complex and there are many issues involved. Given the magnitude of the problem and the desire to achieve it. consensus as much as possible, we will continue our meetings to see if the differences that do exist can be bridged.

“There is still a strong consensus that expansion is desirable, whether it starts early or maybe not until the 2025-2026 season is over.”

Bowlsby and Sankey were both part of the working group that unveiled the plan in June, and both are adamant that the model they announced – 12 teams, six auto-qualifying conference champions – remains is the right model. However, Mountain West commissioner Craig Thompson noted that the eight-team model was not removed from consideration.

The next meeting will take place in January, as both the commissioner and other key individuals involved in the process converge around the annual meetings. However, it is no coincidence that Hancock’s statement points to the 2025-26 season.

After that school year, every part of the CFP expires – the good deal, the TV deal, and the whole structure in general. Promoting a new structure until then rather than trying to migrate early will allow the management team to work from an empty team.

Of course, that also means at least four more four-team playoffs. There’s no telling where sport might be at that point.

According to Brian Kelly’s Awakening leave a playoff team at Notre Dame to take a job at LSU, Sankey was asked how worried he was about the timeline of the coaching carousel. He points out that extending the Early Contracting Period is a “slow” short-term decision-making process – quickly trying to solve one problem and creating another in response.

As executives consider expansion, Sankey points to decisions such as why the CFP Management Committee has been cautious.

“I think one of the useful parts of the conversation going on is the recognition that we need to look at the big picture. College football, not just post-season but how that connects with the rest of the year,” Sankey said. I think it’s one of those views that agrees just being open to thinking more generally about our policy decisions and its impact. “